Comments on: A-IMS from Verizon and Buddies: A Good thing as I see it http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/ Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:18:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Arjun http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/comment-page-1/#comment-48 Arjun Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:54:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/#comment-48 You noticed correctly. However, I have no interest ,gain, nor loss in either mentioning or not mentioning Cisco. Looks like I just missed mentioning their name. Sorry I couldn't offer a more climactic response. I am glad you appreciate Cisco's role in this. You noticed correctly. However, I have no interest ,gain, nor loss in either mentioning or not mentioning Cisco. Looks like I just missed mentioning their name. Sorry I couldn’t offer a more climactic response. I am glad you appreciate Cisco’s role in this.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/comment-page-1/#comment-47 Anonymous Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:38:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/#comment-47 I notice that Cisco notoriously absent from mention in your article as one of the partners developing this solution for VzW, aside from the snide remark about the old Cisco IAD. Since Cisco is first in the "Acknowlegements" section of the A-IMS Architecture doc (June 2006) I can only assume this is intentional.<br/><br/>In reality, Cisco is responsible for implementation of the Bearer Manager portion of the solution that you seem to like so well.<br/><br/>And thank God that Cisco is involved - otherwise A-IMS would wind up with same problems, shortfalls, and oversights as IMS. Because that is what happens when telecom network people try to write a data spec. I notice that Cisco notoriously absent from mention in your article as one of the partners developing this solution for VzW, aside from the snide remark about the old Cisco IAD. Since Cisco is first in the “Acknowlegements” section of the A-IMS Architecture doc (June 2006) I can only assume this is intentional.

In reality, Cisco is responsible for implementation of the Bearer Manager portion of the solution that you seem to like so well.

And thank God that Cisco is involved – otherwise A-IMS would wind up with same problems, shortfalls, and oversights as IMS. Because that is what happens when telecom network people try to write a data spec.

]]> By: Arjun http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/comment-page-1/#comment-46 Arjun Sat, 24 Feb 2007 05:05:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/#comment-46 Unfortunately not. It seems Verizon and partners keep the specs close to their heart, so to speak. Unfortunately not. It seems Verizon and partners keep the specs close to their heart, so to speak.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/comment-page-1/#comment-45 Anonymous Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:41:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/#comment-45 Does Verizon give any details about the policy manager ? Are there any standard docs available in this regard, just curious Does Verizon give any details about the policy manager ? Are there any standard docs available in this regard, just curious

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Anonymous Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:39:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/a-ims-from-verizon-and-buddies-a-good-thing-as-i-see-it/#comment-44 Does Verizon give any details about the policy manager ? Are there any standard docs available in this regard, just curious Does Verizon give any details about the policy manager ? Are there any standard docs available in this regard, just curious

]]>