Comments on: IMS vs. 3G vs. Wimax – Part I (Basics) http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/ Commentary on VoIP, SIP, IMS, Web 2.0 and Technology Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:49:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Anonymous http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-71 Anonymous Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:15:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-71 Good work. Good work.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-70 Anonymous Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:30:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-70 Interesting to read. I think that some mobile operators are concerned on the SCIM layer functionality provided by next generation IN to have a brokering between the legacy and next generation protocols like Camel Phase 2 to ISC interface. Do you have any thoughts on this.<br/><br/>-Subbzz, New Zealand Interesting to read. I think that some mobile operators are concerned on the SCIM layer functionality provided by next generation IN to have a brokering between the legacy and next generation protocols like Camel Phase 2 to ISC interface. Do you have any thoughts on this.

-Subbzz, New Zealand

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-69 Anonymous Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:29:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-69 Interesting to read. I think that some mobile operators are concerned on the SCIM layer functionality provided by next generation IN to have a brokering between the legacy and next generation protocols like Camel Phase 2 to ISC interface. Do you have any thoughts on this.<br/><br/>-Subbzz, New Zealand Interesting to read. I think that some mobile operators are concerned on the SCIM layer functionality provided by next generation IN to have a brokering between the legacy and next generation protocols like Camel Phase 2 to ISC interface. Do you have any thoughts on this.

-Subbzz, New Zealand

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-68 Anonymous Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:10:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-68 Excellent read. Very clear. Congratulations! Excellent read. Very clear. Congratulations!

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.roychowdhury.org/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-67 Anonymous Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:19:00 +0000 http://iconverged.wordpress.com/2006/12/07/ims-vs-3g-vs-wimax-%e2%80%93-part-i-basics/#comment-67 Good read. <br/>I believe the future will have IMS (or the likes) as the Core Network whatever be the access technology. Also co-existence of Wimax and 3G depends a lot on their interworking without which they are always going to be rivals. <br/>Waiting for part II (Interworking stuff). Good read.
I believe the future will have IMS (or the likes) as the Core Network whatever be the access technology. Also co-existence of Wimax and 3G depends a lot on their interworking without which they are always going to be rivals.
Waiting for part II (Interworking stuff).

]]>